{"id":131,"date":"2012-03-25T18:11:04","date_gmt":"2012-03-25T22:11:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/?p=131"},"modified":"2016-12-11T01:05:52","modified_gmt":"2016-12-11T06:05:52","slug":"rescission-of-transactions-consummated-by-fraud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/?p=131","title":{"rendered":"Rescission Of Transactions Consummated By Fraud"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a short summary of the law in New York regarding rescission of transactions consummated by fraud &#8211;\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In Bloomquist v. Farson et\u00a0al., 222 N.Y. 375, 380; 118 N.E. 855; 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1467 (1918), the Court of Appeals long ago held\u00a0that a transaction should be rescinded when it has been consummated through misrepresentation, even if\u00a0fraud has been alleged but the facts do not rise to the level of actionable fraud:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;An action may be maintained in equity to rescind a transaction which has been<br \/>\nconsummated through misrepresentation of material facts not amounting to fraud.<br \/>\nUnlike an action at law for damages, intentional misstatements need not be proved.<br \/>\n(Hammond v. Pennock, 61 N. Y. 145, 152; Carr [***10] v. Nat. Bank &amp; Loan Co. of<br \/>\nWatertown, 167 N. Y. 375; Squiers v. Thompson, 73 App. Div. 552; affd., 172 N. Y. 652;<br \/>\nLyon v. James, 97 App. Div. 385; affd., 181 N. Y. 512; Schank v. Schuchman, 212 N. Y.<br \/>\n352; Canadian Agency, Ltd., v. Assets R. Co., 165 App. Div. 96; Cook on Corp. sec.<br \/>\n536.)<\/p>\n<p>The fact that the plaintiffs have alleged fraud and deceit is not fatal to the action\u00a0provided the proof establishes misrepresentations and that these are material,influencing the bargain. (Hammond v. Pennock, 61 N. Y. 145, and the report of the casein the General Term at 5 Lans. 358; Lamphere v. Lang, 213 N. Y. 585; Graves v. Waite,59 N. Y. 156; Churchill v. St. George Dev. Co., 174 App. Div. 1; Novotny v. Kosloff, 214\u00a0N. Y. 12.)\u00a0Equity will administer such relief as the exigencies of the case demand at the close\u00a0of the trial. (Lightfoot v. Davis, 198 N. Y. 261, 273.)&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When a real estate transaction is predicated on misrepresentations and a party has not received\u00a0what he bargained for, the entire transaction should be rescinded. Meck v. Allen Properties, Inc., 206\u00a0Misc. 251; 132 N.Y.S.2d 674; 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2668 (Sup. Ct., Spec. Term, Queens Co. 1954).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>If you have any legal questions or need help with a fraud case, please contact Attorney Scott Lanin at (212) 764-7250 x 201 or use the contact form in the right sidebar.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is a short summary of the law in New York regarding rescission of transactions consummated by fraud &#8211;\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ny-business-litigator-blog-ny-real-estate-litigator-blog"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=131"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":490,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131\/revisions\/490"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nybusinesslitigator.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}